The following letter thanks our Executive Director for writing a letter of opposition. We urge you to do the same. Instructions follow.
Whether you represent an organization, a consumer or just yourself, please modify the model letter here to make the maximum impact in order to tell your story.
Thanks again for signing on to the May 24, 2017 letters
to California members of Congress and H.R. 620 cosponsors! You joined 110 disability and civil rights organizations from across California to oppose the so-called “ADA Education and Reform Act of 2017.” Our letter reached our entire Congressional delegation and has been a model for similar letters in other states.
We’re reaching out today to a few of the organizations that signed the previous letter to ask that you contact Senator Feinstein’s office in writing to oppose the Senate version of H.R. 620, which is expected to be introduced in the Senate soon.
The D.C. team has been working with Senator Feinstein’s staff to oppose these legislative efforts and has learned that Senator Feinstein wants to hear from more California organizations. Letters are needed from California disability and civil rights organizations about why you oppose ADA notification legislation.
To assist in these efforts, you can, if you wish, use the resources below, including a letter/email outline with key points for Senator Feinstein to hear from California organizations. If you prefer, just write a note stating your reason(s) for opposing H.R. 620.
Letter/email outline and key points:
1. Organization intro – a brief description of your organization and the work it does on behalf of the California communities you represent.
2. Thank Senator Feinstein for her longtime support of the disability community.
3. Briefly state your organization’s (or your own) opposition to any legislation amending the ADA to add a “notice” requirement , and state your reasons.
- Resource: Letter to California Delegation
- State that your organization opposes amending the ADA and risking it being opened to other harmful changes
- State that your organization opposes any bill that includes notification language –
- So-called “notice” legislation removes any incentive for businesses to comply proactively with the ADA. This change in the law would be a boon for businesses at the expense of people with disabilities.
- Requiring “notice” makes it far more advantageous for a business to delay doing anything to ensure access for all until it receives a notice that someone was not able to access their public accommodation.
- In practice, the proposed requirements of these laws mean the continued exclusion of individuals with disabilities from the basic public accommodations of daily life – for weeks, months, and even years.
4. Give an example of someone who would be harmed –
- Our organization (or you) represents (or are yourself an) individual(s) who would be harmed by this legislation [State example]
5. Conclusion – we look forward to working with Senator Feinstein in opposing this legislation and working to protect the rights of individuals with disabilities.